1984: Melinda and Bill Gates’ Dystopian Ethos of Propaganda

“Our ethos is all that we currently hold to be true. It is what we act upon.  It governs our manners, our business, and our politics.” ~ Howard Zinn

Big Brother: [voice-over] “This is our land. A land of peace and of plenty. A land of harmony and hope. This is our land. Oceania. These are our people. The workers, the strivers, the builders. These are our people. The builders of our world, struggling, fighting, bleeding, dying. On the streets of our cities and on the far-flung battlefields. Fighting against the mutilation of our hopes and dreams. Who are they? ” ~  IMDb, “1984”

    

Yes, WHO are THEY?  

They tell you this is our land.

They tell you we live in a land of peace.

They tell you that we live in a land of plenty.

They tell us we live in a land of harmony.

They tell us we live in a land of hope.

They even tell us we are her people…the workers, the strivers, the builders.

They tell us it is THEM “fighting against the mutilation of our hopes and dreams.

They  tell you “these are our people.”  

They tell you they care about the “builders of our world, the struggling, the fighting, the bleeding, the dying.  

They tell you they care about our streets, our cities …

…and then Bill and Melinda Gates (and the rest of the 1% Corporate leaders of the world) take

ACTION opposite of their words —-

words of propaganda —

bringing us  they dystopia of 1984.


One has to wonder what is happening in the world when the RICH and FAMOUS of “Who’s Who in America?” bring us into George Orwell’s world of “1984”?

“The mechanism by which ideas are disseminated on a large scale is propaganda, in the broad sense of an organized effort to spread a particular belief or doctrine.”  ~  Edward Bernays

But Edward Bernays asks us an important question in 1928 in his book “Propaganda”.  He asks an important question about this brainwashing:

Who is doing the brainwashing?  Who are the new propagandists?

WHO are the men who, without our realizing it, give us our ideas, tell us whom to admire and whom to despise, what to believe about the ownership of public utilities, about the tariff, about the price of rubber, about the Dawes Plan, about immigration; who tell us how our houses should be designed, what furniture we should put into them, what menus we should serve on our table, what kind of shirts we must wear, what sports we should indulge in, what plays we should see, what charities we should support, what pictures we should admire, what slang we should affect, what jokes we should laugh at? “

  If we set out to make a list of the men and women who, because of their position in public life, might fairly be called the molders of public opinion, we could quickly arrive at an extended list of persons mentioned in “Who’s Who.” ~  Edward Bernays, History Is A Weapon”  (emphasis added)

Bernays goes on to describe the inner working of this group further here:

 “In theory, everybody buys the best and cheapest commodities offered him on the market. In practice, if every one went around pricing, and chemically testing before purchasing, the dozens of soaps or fabrics or brands of bread which are for sale, economic life would become hopelessly jammed. To avoid such confusion, society consents to have its choice narrowed to ideas and objects brought to its attention through propaganda of all kinds. There is consequently a vast and continuous effort going on to capture our minds in the interest of some policy or commodity or idea. 

It might be better to have, instead of propaganda and special pleading, committees of wise men who would choose our rulers, dictate our conduct, private and public, and decide upon the best types of clothes for us to wear and the best kinds of food for us to eat. But we have chosen the opposite method, that of open competition. We must find a way to make free competition function with reasonable smoothness. To achieve this society has consented to permit free competition to be organized by leadership and propaganda.”    Edward Bernays, History Is A Weapon”  

Certainly, if Bill and Melinda Gates are masters of ANYTHING, they are masters of propaganda, a word softened by using language like “public relations”.

How else would Gates build their monopoly at Microsoft on an inferior product?

Have Melinda and Bill Gates slipped this time?  After all, they seem to have been successfully hiding their dystopian plans for America quite nicely from average American consumers behind their propaganda until now.

But where did all this propaganda, this “public relations”, marketing, advertising, and consumerism begin?

When did we start allowing Capitalism to intersect with government? Some say “It started with Reagan’s deregulation.”

Let’s look back further….back to the last great depression, post war 1928...  back to another time of dystopia —– and review a bit more of Edward Bernays.

In Dystopias of the Great War Era they write in a thesis from SEDHE:

“The United States prior to World War I was a veritable breeding ground of corporate corruption. Such colorful figures as Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, and John D. Rockefeller became icons of capitalism. They had hundreds of millions of dollars – billions in today’s dollars – to such a degree that Rockefeller’s personal assets once bailed the U.S. government out of a financial slump. Industry prior to World War I was largely unregulated; unions were broken up and union members beaten and fired. The United States was not a pretty place prior to World War I. England after World War I was similarly a bastion of capitalism, a place where prosperity enticed people to buy things. The mass production of products for the consumer, one of the major projects of the Industrial Revolution, had come to a head.” ~  SEDHE

The Father of Spin book review

During that time, long ago in that post war-time of dystopia, Sigmund Freud was an uncle of a man named Edward Bernays.  Bernays wrote his book Propaganda in 1928.

“Many of the new insights that Tye offers have to do with Bernays’s relationship with his family and his uncle Sigmund Freud, whose reputation as “the father of psychoanalysis” owes something to Bernays’ publicity efforts. Bernays regarded Uncle Sigmund as a mentor, and used Freud’s insights into the human psyche and motivation to design his PR campaigns, while also trading on his famous uncle’s name to inflate his own stature.

There is, however, a striking paradox in the relationship between the two. Uncle Sigmund’s “talking cure” was designed to unearth his patients’ unconscious drives and hidden motives, in the belief that bringing them into conscious discourse would help people lead healthier lives. Bernays, by contrast, used psychological techniques to mask the motives of his clients, as part of a deliberate strategy aimed at keeping the public unconscious of the forces that were working to mold their minds.” ~  Larry Tye, “The Father of Spin:  Edward Bernays and the Birth of PR”    [Note: You'll find some of Bernay's quotes below.]

So here we have it.  Propaganda could be used for good to serve the needs of the individual needing psychological support or it could be used for subversive thought control of others to serve the needs of the propagandist.

It is evident that Melinda and Bill Gates are using their brand of propaganda for subversive thought control of others to serve the needs of the propagandist.

Now the Gates are about to step up their game, increasing their mastermind of thought control through another area of expertise for them — technology.

So what am I basing my statement on?  

I’m basing it on Susan Ohanian’s discovery of public documents on the Gates Foundation grants page on their own website.  And of course on previous research which you can read through my prior blog posts, especially this one on Melinda Gates and where their children attend school compared to the policies they push forth in public schools via their propaganda.  I’ll show you their documents directly screen printed from their website below as evidence.

                                    

Leonie Haimson read Susan Ohanian’s post and quickly sent an email around to Parents Across America.

One of the recipients on this list was Diane Ravitch, Education Historian, former Assistant Secretary of Education, and author of “The Death and the Life of the Great American School System”.

Despite her rivalry with Bill Gates, Diane Ravitch was quite shocked by this Freudian slip.  She writes on her blog:

“I opened the following email and at first I thought it was a prank or, as another reader put it, an article taken from The Onion.”  ~  Diane Ravitch, “Just When You Thought It Couldn’t Get Crazier“, WordPress Blog

Diane’s reaction was probably similar to many’s when she received Leonie Haimson’s email about Susan Ohanian’s futuristic and frightening discovery.

I can only imagine Diane’s thoughts [Is this some kind of joke?] as she read the subject line:

From: Leonie Haimson

To: nyceducationnews ; paa news
Sent: Fri, Jun 8, 2012 10:08 am
Subject: [nyceducationnews] Gates Foundation: one more step into the dystopian future with electronic bracelets for students & teachers

Could it be that there is a crack in the foundation of the Gates Foundation’s education policies that are created to promote their real agenda through propaganda?

Could it be that they went too far this time with their belief in “innovation and technology”?

Actually, we find the Gates are constantly pushing for innovation, but if they were to study propaganda, they would find that their method of thought control actually prevents innovation.  If they have studied propaganda, perhaps that is the real purpose.  After all, isn’t innovation the opposite of thought control?

While novels have been written, their authors contemplated the realities of aBrave New World”.

Huxley warned us of science being used as a tool in racism.  Here in SEDHE’s introduction they write:

Huxley is deeply suspicious of science, and he imbues Mustapha Mond with this same suspicion. Science in Brave New World does not seek to learn higher truths. It merely exists to keep the status quo in control. “All our science is just a cookery book, with an orthodox theory of cooking that nobody’s supposed to question, and a list of recipes that mustn’t be added to except by special permission from the head cook,” says Mustapha Mond (225). True science would be a threat to the stability of the society that Mond has spent so much time attempting to create and sustain. The only kind of scientific innovation permitted in Brave New World is innovation that, curiously, stifles innovation. “We could synthesize every morsel of food, if we wanted to. But we don’t. We prefer to keep a third of the population on the land. For their own sakes – because it takes longer to get food out of the land than out of a factory,” says Mond (224).

This criticism applies to the twentieth century, as well, with its pervasive theories that still attempted to justify the genetic inferiority or superiority of particular races. Eugenics was merely racism justified by attaching “science” to it. Brave New World criticizes these kinds of pseudo-science as methods of allowing some groups of people to continue to be oppressed, but with a more “rational” means for a more rational world. As long as the justification for racism appears scientific, then agency is removed from human beings (“It’s not my fault the Gammas are inferior; they were born that way”). Huxley goes a step beyond exposing racism in science and creates a world in which science itself creates the conditions that justify that racism. We should be wary of science, Huxley suggests, for it can be used by elites to reinforce their control over marginalized peoples.”  ~ Dystopias of the Great War Era, SEDHE Thesis (emphasis added)

What exactly are the Gates’ plans for these “electronic bracelets”?  

More segregation?  

More sorting and culling of children and teachers?

Who is going to volunteer to be the teachers and students wearing these devices and just what is next?  Shock collars?  
wife yelling needs collar

Answer a question wrong?  Zap!

Students aren’t engaged enough?  Zap!  

Student is overly excited?  Zap!  

Teacher pauses to collect her thoughts?  Zap!

Evidently this kind of galvanic skin response experimentation has already taken place on those easy to control, the “mentally retarded” as this separate study says.

If you have seen the movie “1984”you know of the torture involved.

What do you call sending a child to school for 12 years, only to not allow them to graduate simply because they failed ONE high-stakes test?  

What do you call sending children to school without art, music, PE, recess, or electives?

What do you call selecting and culling children, preventing them from attending  charter schools funded by the wealthy that have fantastic programs, preventing “culled children” from attending due to race, class, or ability?

I don’t know about you, but as a special education teacher, I am outraged at this experimentation with people who are not capable of true consent.

Will children and teachers have any say in the Gates’ experiment either?

Or will galvanic skin response bracelets be the next federal mandate?

Buy Common Core and get one galvanic skin response bracelet free  for the first 12 students free —-  we’ll sell you all the rest for profit?

Well, they’re going to use these ‘electronic galvanic skin response bracelets  for  their “Measures of Effective Teaching Project and “student learning”, of course.

Susan Ohanian tells us about it on her website.  She suggests we look this up on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation site.

I have great respect for Susan, so I did.   Here’s  the first in a series of screen shots of this search typed in on their page:

What will we find when we search, I wonder?  Let’s look at the purpose of their Measurements of Effective Teaching Project [MET].

We all need to start reading more carefully.  We all have to start questioning what we read.  

  • What is the spin?  
  • What is the propaganda?

Note the “ALL LIVES HAVE EQUAL VALUE” propaganda.

Note the “PARTNERSHIPS” propaganda.

Note the “WHAT WE’RE LEARNING” propaganda.

And finally, note the ‘MEASUREMENTS OF EFFECTIVE TEACHING” propaganda.  

Let’s first presume that the common ethos includes this belief:  According to Melinda Gates and PBS, Melinda is some kind of education expert as you can see in their introduction of her for their program, PBS News Hour (emphasis added):

“As the co-founder of The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest philanthropic organization, Melinda Gates has spent decades looking at the challenges and potential solutions to the problems facing America’s education system.

The foundation controls over $30 billion, which its staff uses to pursue the goal of giving every child an equal opportunity to thrive. The majority of the money goes to reducing obstacles such as poor health and malnutrition in developing nations. But in the United States, the focus has been on identifying and supporting ways to fix the inequalities within a public school system, where schools in high-poverty areas fall far behind their more affluent counterparts and other countries in terms of graduation rates and academic achievement.

Since 1994, the foundation has spent over $6 billion in the United States, looking at data-proven ways to improve student achievement and often jumping into controversial policy debates such as smaller schools in New York City, charter schools, high-stakes testing and teacher evaluation systems around the country.”

Okay, so the common ethos here is that because Melinda and Bill Gates have been pouring their money into public education, they are experts, and because they have more money than you are I; they are infallible.

If we act on this belief, we take everything they say, all their policies as truth, no?

Here’s Melinda Gates’ ethos…  She says:

  • “American schools are broken.”  
  • “We really do need an effective teacher.”
  • “We’re really going to go for getting an evaluation system to tell us whether they are effective or not.”

Here’s her video on PBS where she plays out the expert role, an expert, that is, at spewing her propaganda.

Melinda Gates on Teacher Evaluation PBS News Hour

Well, now let’s change our minds.  Let’s change our ethos and believe something far different.

Let’s believe that Bill and Melinda Gates are pushing propaganda for a less than altruistic motive.

Let’s just say it’s something as innocent as remaining the richest couple in the world and to do so, they need to break into the frontier of public education testing, Common Core curriculum for every child in America, text books for every child in America, technology from Microsoft for every child in America, teacher professional development and teacher training for every teacher in America, and so on.

Certainly the $8 Billion expected as profits from the textbooks alone, on top of the  implementation of Common Core Curriculum ought to add something to their coffers of cash.

Note: Gates has partnered with Pearson on Common Core.

Here’s what Lisa Fleisher has to tell us about the profits they are about to rake in  JUST from the textbooks ALONE (emphasis added):

“As public schools implement a new set of nearly national curriculum standards, publishers are expecting a wave of demand for new textbooks, tests and teacher preparation.

The guidelines will reshape how students learn math and English in 45 states. The total cost isn’t clear, but a study to be released Wednesday by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute says the price tag could be as high as $1 billion to $8 billion.

Such publishers as Pearson PLC, McGraw-Hill Cos. and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt are marketing rewritten or revamped textbooks aligned with the new guidelines, called the Common Core State Standards.’ ~ Lisa Fleisher, “Textbook Sales Likely to Rise  on New Rules”

So let’s shift our ethos to understand that the Gates promote propaganda to help sell products for profit.

If this new ethos is true, then let’s deconstruct the purpose of the Gates’ MET Project first statement as we begin to think about the idea of using galvanic skin response bracelets to measure good teaching and learning.

Instead of believing the Gates’ are infallible, let’s believe instead that they are 100% wrong as “educational experts.”

Here is the final Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation screen shot showing the grant to fund the galvanic skin response bracelets for teachers and students.

Here’s the propaganda of the Gates Foundation on their MET Project:

  1. Evidence shows clearly what most people know intuitively: teachers matter more to student learning than anything else inside a school.

Here’s the truth  as told by education experts:

Diane Ravitch Response to Melinda Gates on PBS

Here’s Diane Ravitch’s response to Melinda Gates on PBS News Hour.  Diane says:

“Well, are there ineffective teachers? I’m sure there must be. I’ve heard stories of ineffective teachers. And I certainly don’t think there should be even one ineffective teacher in any school.

And it’s the job of the administration, the job of the principal primarily, to make sure that no ineffective teacher ever gets tenure. Once they get tenure, all that means is — it doesn’t mean they have a lifetime job. It doesn’t mean they get paid for breathing. It means that they have a right to due process. If, after getting tenure, the principal says, I want to fire you, they have to have evidence. They have to have a hearing before an impartial administrator.

That really is not such a burdensome thing. But it’s very clear that this is not the key problem in American education, because the lowest performance is not in union districts. The highest performance in America is Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Jersey. These are three states that are all union states.

They have very strong collective bargaining agreements and the highest-performing states. The weakest performance is in the states that have no collective bargaining and where there’s a lot of poverty. I think it’s really important in your discussions about education that you recognize that the most — the biggest single correlate and, very likely, I would say the cause of low performance is not teachers or union contracts. It’s poverty and racial isolation.

In every district where there is very low academic achievement, there is poverty and racial isolation. And yet we are now trapped in this national conversation where there’s almost an agreement we will not talk about poverty. We will not talk about racial isolation. We will just talk about teachers. We are talking about the wrong problem.”  ~  Diane Ravitch, PBS News Hour

Here’s what Alfie Kohn says about what matters most to student learning:

“Every empirical investigation of this question has found that socioeconomic status (SES) in all its particulars accounts for an overwhelming proportion of the variance in test scores when different schools, towns, or states are compared.(1)  Thus ignorance would be the most charitable explanation for why charts are published that rank schools (or towns or states) by these scores — or why anyone would use those rankings to draw conclusions about classroom quality.” ~  Alfie Kohn, Fighting the Tests, [2001]

What does Diane Ravitch think of Melinda Gates and Bill Gates influence on education through their so called, “philanthropy”?

How does Ravitch view the Gates’ ethos of “expertise” in education?

PBS News Hour’s Ray Suarez asked Diane:

“Have the foundations been a worthwhile addition to the debate over the future of education?”

Diane replied (emphasis added):

Well, I have a chapter in my book about — I call them the billionaire boys club. The billionaires boys club is led by the three biggest foundations in America, the Gates Foundation, the Walton Foundation, the Broad Foundation.

These are the three billionaire foundations that give a lot of money to American education. And it has been given to push the privatization movement forward, as well as to put a very heavy emphasis on testing and test scores as part of teacher evaluation. I think that — you know, I’m a historian. So, I look back and I say, there has never been a time in our national life where foundations, which are accountable to no one, make decisions about what our education policy should be.

Sometimes, they make the wrong bet. And the Gates Foundation is a very good example of this. They put $2 billion into breaking up large high schools into small high schools. And after doing that for almost a decade, they said, whoops, that didn’t work. We’re not going to do that anymore. Now we’re going to put the focus on teacher evaluation.

And so the immense amount of money, the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Gates Foundation and now these other big foundations are pouring in, they are directing the national conversation. And I think that’s not — it strikes me that that’s in some ways not democratic.

Our conversations about what to do about our schools should be held at the local level and at the state level. The federal government is there to level the playing field. They’re not there to steer the boat.”  ~  Diane Ravitch, PBS News Hour

Now that the Gates Foundation is placing money into the hands of the developers of galvanic skin response bracelets to add to their data bank on teacher evaluation and student learning, what’s next?

So really, what is next?  Here’s just one example:

From Geeko Systems we see that a bracelet isn’t really needed.  All this can”data” be tracked by something much like a temporary tattoo.

“A team of researchers from the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign have developed small electronic devices that can be worn on the skin. These temporary tattoos make the person wearing them a part of the device, which can bend, stretch, and move along with the skin. The researchers were hoping to make less obtrusive medical monitors for special needs patients, like premature babies, but the new sensors have proven so successful they could also be used for a variety of other applications.

The idea of making wearable sensors that adhere to the skin seems so easy and useful it’s surprising no one has developed them before. According to researchers, the major challenge in developing the technology was making the parts of the sensor as flexible and stretchy as skin. To do this, the researchers had to take brittle silicon and make it more bendable by making the sensor incredibly thin. The electronic parts of the sensor, light-emitting diodes, solar cells, transistors, and antennae, were assembled in an S-shape that would allow the circuits to still work when stretched in different directions.

 The sensor components are stuck between two protective layers of the polymer polyimide, and these layers sit on top of a rubbery film of silicone that attaches to the skin using weak chemical bonds. The device adheres similarly to a temporary tattoo, which disguises the sensor grid and makes it stick longer. The electronic sensor is less intrusive than other electrode-based monitoring systems that require bulky wires.

According to the researchers, the devices can pick up heartbeats when stuck on the chest, skeletal muscle activity when on the leg, and brainwaves when on the forehead. In their trials of the device, the researchers recorded signals from a thin wire that relayed data to a computer. The sensors were able to collect accurate data for up to six hours and showed no sign of skin irritation where they were attached after 24 hours.

Nanoengineer Michael McAlpine of Princeton University (who was not involved in the research) told Science News:

“This is a huge breakthrough. This goes beyond Dick Tracy calling someone with a cell phone on the wrist. It’s having the wrist itself house the device so it’s always with you.”

The potential for these devices goes far beyond just tracking heartbeats. The researchers tested their sensors to see if they could control a computer. When adhered to the throat, the device was able to read the electrical activity of the muscles moving when the test subject spoke the commands up, down, left, and right. This proved to be a successful way to control a computer’s cursor as it moved through a maze.

So far, the device can be powered by wireless coils and solar cells, and the researchers hope to improve the devices’ power storage capabilities. The researchers believe that in the future these devices could even run on the energy from body heat or stray electromagnetic signals.

Right now, the researchers are focused on the biomedical applications of this electronic sensor temporary tattoo, however, even with a multitude of medical possibilities, there are other ways this technology could be used. One example, aside from controlling computer movements, is CIA interest in developing the technology as a way for agents to silently communicate with one other by tracking the muscle movements that correspond with words.

While the technology isn’t available to the public, it is certainly an interesting breakthrough and it will be fascinating to see what kinds of new devices are spawned from it. The research was published in the journal Science.” ~ Erin Podalack, “Electronic Sensors, Stick Like Temporary Tattoos, Present Endless Possibilities”

But why bother with temporary?  Let’s just make it permanent…

I couldn’t help myself.  

I had to see if the Gates Foundation is “building partnerships” with the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign where these devices are being developed.

Although the relationship to these devices is not clear, certainly the partnerships are “being developed” through grants from the Gates Foundation to this branch in the University.

<sigh>… It’s only a matter of time.

What if the Gates and the rest of the “Billionaire Boys Club” ethos isn’t quite so innocent?

What if public education by corporations were being used a a tool to deliver permanent NeoSlavery?

And what if this is only one facet of a much larger systemic problem in America and across the globe?

“The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought.”   ~  George Orwell, “1984”

 

Here are some quotes from “Propaganda” by Bernays (emphasis added):

“If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it… In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons … who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

“We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized.”

“Propaganda will never die out. Intelligent men must realize that propaganda is the modern instrument by which they can fight for productive ends and help to bring order out of chaos.” …

“Ours must be a leadership democracy administered by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses. Is this government by propaganda? Call it, if you prefer, government by education. But education, in the academic sense of the word, is not sufficient. It must be enlightened expert propaganda through the creation of circumstances, through the high-spotting of significant events, and the dramatization of important issues. The statesman of the future will thus be enabled to focus the public mind on crucial points of policy and regiment a vast, heterogeneous mass of voters to clear understanding and intelligent action.”

“Ours must be a leadership democracy administered by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses. Is this government by propaganda?  Call it, if you prefer, government by education. But education, in the academic sense of the word, is not sufficient. It must be enlightened expert propaganda through the creation of circumstances, through the high-spotting of significant events, and the dramatization of important issues. The statesman of the future will thus be enabled to focus the public mind on crucial points of policy and regiment a vast, heterogeneous mass of voters to clear understanding and intelligent action.” 

 “They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social structure. Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world. “ ~ Edward Barnays , “History Is a Weapon”

What if the entire time our own country’s moral principles have been in place to give you a false sense of equity and choice, a false ethos of propaganda?

Our freedom would be at stake, our democracy would be a sham.

How could this be?  

Could we have been a sham all along?  

Remember when women, the people of color, the poor, began to question our founding fathers about equality?  

Oh, ya.  That’s right:  equality was just for the rich, white, male land owner of privilege.  

Has this REALLY changed? (class war, racism, war on women, human rights, immigrant rights, etc.)

 Are we persuaded into our labor by the mere hope of equality?

Our country seems both obsessed and anesthetized by consumerism.

I think Melinda and Bill Gates are counting on it.  Counting on our buying every one of their monopolized products and agendas.

What if Melinda and Bill Gates, by controlling public education were also able to control government and democracy?


Now the real question becomes:  What are you going to do about this threat to our freedom?

Here’s what Senator Bernie Sanders has to say about America’s freedom.

 “Freedom does not simply mean rallying oneself behind the flag.  It’s a great flag, but freedom means allowing the kind of dissent and vigorous debate, and tolerance of onerous points of view, that people regard as obnoxious and hateful, because we understand that once you say, I don’t want to hear that point of view, you can’t say that, you begin to stifle all kinds of points of view. you begin to create a mindset.  Freedom is a very delicate thing, it’s a very delicate thing between limiting people’s intellectual growth, or not.  And that’s why we have to be vigourous and extremely proud.  This flag means the constitution of the United States.  We as Americans should be very very proud of that and we should do everything we can to fight THOSE people who for political reasons are trying to limit basic freedoms in America.  ~  Bernie Sanders

Edward Bernays taught the corporations how to market their products to you by pushing your buttons.  The thought police are growing stronger and we must resist.

O’Brien: Power is tearing human minds apart and putting them back together in new shapes of your own choosing.

“That which the system holds most dear is its greatest weakness.” ~ Ethos

Here’s what YOU can DO:

  • Stop believing the propaganda of corporations.
  • Think critically about EVERYTHING you read and view.
  • Determine your own truth and trust your intuition, your “gut” reaction.
  • STOP CONSUMING!  They need us!  We don’t NEED them.  This is their weakness!
  • Listen to expert professionals, not corporations.
  • Speak up against corporate control over a profession that is complex and leave this work to the professionals who are educators.
  • Demand the education policies in place that require high stakes testing be stopped immediately.
  • Demand a moratorium on all testing that is NOT teacher created, that is not diagnostic in nature to benefit authentic learning through prescriptions created by expert teachers.
  • Write letters to your school board, letters to the editor, op-eds, your superintendents, your congressmen, your state department of education, the federal department of education, the president of the United States.
  • Blog, read, share your information via email, Facebook, and Twitter expansively.  Tell your neighbors.  Tell your friends.  Speak out!
  • Protest:  The Gates Foundation, Microsoft, Pearson, Wal-Mart, The Koch Brothers, the Broad Foundation, all private and so called “public” charter schools, the Departments of Education at state and federal levels.
  • Occupy your classroom and teach the arts – teach social justice, history, and the civics including the importance for the freedom of dissent – teach through as much real reform as you can get by with and keep fighting for more!
  • March, protest, strike – your freedom and the freedom of your children is at stake.

About Teachers'LettersToBillGates

Our mission is to create a dialogue with Bill and Melinda Gates in order to achieve a democratic influence on public education through the voices of education researchers, professors of education, administrators, school board members, professional teachers, parents, students, and community members. We would appreciate Bill and Melinda's feedback and want to influence their education policy and financial decisions by adding democratic voices to create meaningful relevant education for children. View all posts by Teachers'LettersToBillGates

5 responses to “1984: Melinda and Bill Gates’ Dystopian Ethos of Propaganda

  • JoJoFox

    I am a special education teacher also…for the past 43 years. I have witnessed the subtle and not so subtle changes in education and have been VERY concerned for years, more like deeply troubled. The Terri Schiavo court ordered death was my ‘red-flag’!
    I applaud this blog…..It’s all true…and when witnesses as a collective gathering of articles and facts, as you have done here, ALARMING! Thank you !

    • livingbehindthegates

      Hi Jo Jo ~

      I am deeply troubled too. Thank you for your support. What actions should we take? What do you suggest readers do about it?

  • Dalpay

    So what you are saying is Private Philanthropy is not welcome?

    • livingbehindthegates

      I am saying: Bill and Melinda Gates aren’t “private” philanthropists. They are Corporate Vultures. Everything they philanthropic mission they “give to” has big government puppet strings and profit for Gates attached to it. They have their hooks in our government and pull the strings, leaving the voices of all public stakeholders out of our government. Look into their work. They are America’s most dangerous couple. Their philanthropy is a scam. Dig deeper, research.

  • spoplawski

    I am astonished that your (livingbehindthegates) deep description of problems and analysis of their sources did not resonate with more readers in the last 11 months since its publication.
    Your topic of true motives behind the Gates’ philanthropy is quite touchy and complex. Reading your explanations with examples is very convincing, but not in 102% (haha!). We are not able to exclude a scenario that the Gates may have true/honest intentions, but that they also interact with unknown for the public the most powerful organization – the Center Of 1% (CO1%). It can be compared to a Politburo of the richest on a global scale.
    In the communist countries (my experience) there were PMs and governments with different ministers, but all of them acted acted as puppets with their true mentors giving orders, but invisible for the public (the communist media were forbidden to inform the public about their activities). For the freshly rich like Gates/Wal-Mart’s owners etc. this Politburo (PB) of the CO1% are the real gods and they are allowed to play only a propaganda role portraying the invisible greediest richest & organized (as mafia) as also generous.
    Just look at this ‘miracle’ that the Gates after giving away not long time ago over 50% of their fortune for philanthropic prograns are now reemerging as the top rich, but it is not my point.

    My point is that the Gates as other generous richest do not humbly praise God in their messages. Instead we hear their sounding smart politically correct PR statements and social diagnoses. Truly ruling them ‘Almighty’ PB of CO1% today only wants/demands/achieves more control over the masses what is more difficult to obtain when dealing with religious, respecting local traditions and higher values (not promoted consumerism and cult of money) people. That is why they devalue such values and the Gate’ ‘war for education’ perfectly distracts human attention from global uprooting/fooling whole nations. The communists after gaining power focused their energy on destroying religions, local culture and the middle class/intelligentsia – and exactly the same actions we see today on a global scale done by the monopolized media (MSM), puppet governments with help of many lapdogs like Obama/Harper/Cameron/Merkel/Hollande etc and their provocations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers

%d bloggers like this: